Monday, 02 Jun 2025

Alito blasts 'unprecedented' SCOTUS move to halt Trump's Venezuelan deportations: 'Legally questionable'

Justice Samuel Alito issued a strongly-worded dissent against the SCOTUS decision to stop President Trump's deportations of Venezuelan criminals under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.


Alito blasts 'unprecedented' SCOTUS move to halt Trump's Venezuelan deportations: 'Legally questionable'

The decision, which was issued early Saturday morning, effectively blocks the deportations of Venezuelan migrants under the 18th century law. In a decision that was also signed off on by conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, the court advised the White House not to remove Venezuelans held in Texas' Bluebonnet Detention Center "until further order of this court."

Alito disapproved of the timing of the decision, which he described as being "literally in the middle of the night."

"[T]he Court issued unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts a chance to rule, without hearing from the opposing party, within eight hours of receiving the application, with dubious factual support for its order, and without providing any explanation for its order," Alito wrote.

The justice, who has served on the court since 2006, was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas in his dissent.

"I refused to join the Court's order because we had no good reason to think that, under the circumstances, issuing an order at midnight was necessary or appropriate," Alito continued.

"Both the Executive and the Judiciary have an obligation to follow the law. The Executive must proceed under the terms of our order in Trump v. J. G. G., 604 U. S. ___ (2025) (per curiam), and this Court should follow established procedures."

Later on Saturday, counsel representing the Trump administration filed an opposition to the order. The lawyers said that the federal government gave advance notice to detainees before their deportations, allowing enough time to file habeas claims.

"The government has agreed not to remove, pursuant the AEA, those AEA detainees who do file habeas claims (including the putative class representatives)," the filing states. 

"This Court should dissolve its current administrative stay and allow the lower courts to address the relevant legal and factual questions in the first instance - including the development of a proper factual record."

Fox News Digital's Landon Mion and Alexandra Koch and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

you may also like

Beach days benefit mental health and well-being as visits provide 'sea therapy'
  • by foxnews
  • descember 09, 2016
Beach days benefit mental health and well-being as visits provide 'sea therapy'

Discover the benefits of sea therapy as experts highlight how beach visits can boost mental well-being, reduce stress and improve sleep through mindfulness and relaxation.

read more